المصدر: Royal Society of Chemistry book on maths of NMR etc في منتدى : قسم الكيمياء Ebook is possible for free, see below. Essential Mathematics for NMR and MRI Spectroscopists, Keith C Brown, Royal Society of Chemistry 2017, 9781782627975, 867pgs Essential Mathematics for NMR and MRI Spectroscopists Author: Keith C Brown This book is print only Buy hardback £86.99 Print publication date: 13 Dec 2016 2017 978-1-78262-797-5 9781782627975, 867pgs About this book Beginning with a review of the important areas of mathematics, this book then covers many of the underlying theoretical and practical aspects of NMR and MRI spectroscopy from a maths point of view. Competence in algebra and introductory calculus is needed but all other maths concepts are covered. It will bridge a gap between high level and introductory titles used in NMR or MRI spectroscopy. Uniquely, it takes a very careful and pedagogical approach to the mathematics behind NMR and MRI. It leaves out very few steps, which distinguishes it from other books in the field. The author is an NMR laboratory manager and is sympathetic to the frustrations of trying to understand where some of the fundamental equations come from hence his desire to either explicitly derive all equations for the reader or direct them to derivations. This is an essential text aimed at graduate students who are beginning their careers in NMR or MRI spectroscopy and laboratory managers if they need an understanding of the theoretical foundations of the technique. Book content Complex Numbers Matrices Vectors Vector Calculus Tensor Analysis Probability and Statistics Waves Fourier Transforms Classical Mechanics Special Relativity Electric and Magnetic Fields The Magnetic Moment and the Bloch Equations Quantum Mechanics The Hamiltonians of NMR The Quantum Mechanics of Angular Momentum NMR Rotation Operators Density Operators The Product Operator Formalism Relaxation and the NOE Data Processing Coherence Transfer Electronics Appendices http:// journals-books-databases/book-authors/inspection-copy/?title=Essential+Mathematics+for+NMR+and+MRI+Spectroscopists&isbn=978-1-78262-797-5 Request a digital inspection copy Title First name Last name Email Phone number Book title ISBN Job title University Course name Number of students Course start date Terms and conditions
I had put a lot of work in the previous version. It all was wasted. The point is that this is very good book. If an instructor is member he can get it by just filling a form. The instructor can get an ebook. otherwise it is paper copy which scan will be bloated. THere are many university professors who are member and they can get it. That is the POINT.
That's why it's important to put your requests in concise layout, and you've been shown an example before, but you always put your topics like that, just copy and past from the publisher pages with all unnecessary details, which leaves the reader confused
I put the details of the topics to ATTRACT and Market the Value to the reader. I put lots of colors in the first version to clearly separate data from request and methodology. I am a very native english reader so I can read english very fast. and from my point of view, it was not confusing. HOWEVER, If you kindly make a copy and edit it to show me how to do it - as you like it, I will follow the pattern. Perhaps, I never got your point clearly. Please just leave my version so both can be tried in the market of ideas. Maybe I can say, Can Any Chemistry Professor get this ebook for me? Is that OK?
That's the core of the problem, by putting many details you assume the reader(s) will get convinced with the importance of the book, so they will try harder to answer your request, and that assumption is completely wrong I have no such pattern at all, the forum is dedicated to researchers to exchange their ideas, and everybody is completely free to put the topic the way they wish, as long as that way is clear, direct and not offensive to others
God bless you. It was so very kind of you take the time to explain me this clearly. I think, you are very correct and that is why my next post is direct and clear. Thank you again.
